by Michelle Richardson
With Election Day over, and the Supervisor's race still uncertain, it's back to work! [The absentee ballot count won't start until November 16th at the earliest.]
At the August 2009 Stuyvesant Town Board meeting, the Town Council's Republican members approved a $4750 budget amendment, with $4500 going to cover the Quadricentennial Calendar. With Democratic councilwoman Roz Gumaer absent, there was no one on the dais to ask questions, but some audience members questioned the expense.
Here is the transcript of the audio [MP3 can be found here]:
Valerie Bertram: We have a budget amendment that we need to do, a total of $4750. $4500 of that is monies that we spent for the completion of our calendar that we did, and the graphic design, and $250 was to the Office of the Aged, so our total is $4750.
Audience: “What was the first part of that?” “Can you repeat that please?”
VB: Um, money that we spent on the Quadricentennial celebration. We did the calendars for 2009 and the graphic design for the calendars.
Martin Roby: Oh, that was $4000?
VB: Yes, all together, between printing costs and…
Ron Knott: [aside, question to Valerie Bertram]
VB: No, we didn’t have to….no
VB: So, do I have a motion, any more questions on that, or…
Ed Scott: I’ll make a motion.
Brad Webster: Second.
VB: Motion is seconded, all in favor.
All Town Board: Aye.
VB: Opposed? [None] Carried.
When questions arose on the online Stuyvesant Forum, Councilman Ron Knott responded that the cost to print 200 calendars was $2800, a cost of $14 each. Since the sale price was $15 each, the town stood to make a $1 profit per calendar. He also said that all labor was volunteer labor, which was inconsistent with what Supervisor Bertram had said at the time of the transfer. He did not respond to further questions and requests for clarification.
We have since learned that his statements were not correct.
There are two line items in the April 2009 abstracts that are attributed to the calendar:
Item 100: Joanne Jakiela, A/C# 7550.4, $225.00 (graphic design)
Item 101: Pro Printers, A/C# 7550.4, $2928.48
Total: $3153.48
So right there was a net loss of 77 cents per calendar. Okay, so it was a commemerative calendar of historic Stuyvesant photos, and it came in over budget because they paid a professional to complete the design work. Fine.
Except they did a budget amendment of $4500 for the calendars. $1346.52 is still unaccounted for. What was it for? Where did it go? Why are Councilmembers responding to questions with false information? Why did the town wait until August to pass a budget amendment for expenses incurred in April? Were they waiting for an opportunity when Councilwoman Gumaer was absent, because Roz is usually the only one who questions what they're voting on and what the money was for? Why have the abstracts been left off of the Town Board minutes posted to the website since April? Is it any wonder our taxes keep going up, when we can't see where our money is going? Is it any wonder our taxes keep going up, when Councilmembers aren't sure what they're voting on?
Roz asked Supervisor Bertram for the actual cost of the calendars, and only received information that accounted for $3153.48. We're still asking where the remaining $1346.52 went, and we expect an answer.




